Skip to main content
Download PDF

Diversity of astroviruses in wild animals in Yunnan province, China

Virology Journal volume 21, Article number: 51 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Astroviruses (AstVs) are single-stranded RNA viruses that have been detected in a wide range of mammals and birds. They are associated with numerous interspecies transmissions and viral recombination events, posing a threat to human and animal health.

Methods

We collected 1,333 samples from wild animals, including bats, rodents, wild boars, and birds, from various states and cities in the Yunnan Province, China, between 2020 and 2023 to investigate the presence of AstVs. AstVs were detected using a polymerase chain reaction targeting the RdRp gene. Finally, the Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis software was used to construct the phylogenetic tree.

Results

The overall positivity rate for AstVs was 7.12% in four species, indicating their widespread occurrence in the region. High genetic diversity among AstVs was observed in different animal species, suggesting the potential for interspecies transmission, particularly among rodents and birds. Additionally, we identified a novel AstV strain and, for the first time, provided information on the presence of bastroviruses in Yunnan, China.

Conclusions

The widespread distribution and high genetic diversity of AstVs, along with the observed potential for interspecies transmission, highlight the importance of further investigation and surveillance in the region. The findings emphasize the need for increased attention to AstVs and their potential impact on human and animal health in Yunnan and other regions.

Background

Astrovirus (AstV) is a single-stranded positive-sense RNA virus belonging to the Astroviridae family. It is a relatively small virus with a genome size of approximately 6.4–7.9 kb [1]. AstVs are classified into two genera: Mammastrovirus (MAstV) and Avastrovirus (AAstV). The name “Astrovirus” is derived from its distinctive star-shaped structure, resembling a dodecahedron. AstVs contain three essential open reading frames (ORFs): ORF1a encoding non-structural proteins that assist in generating functional proteins during the replication process; ORF1b encoding an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) responsible for replicating the viral genome; and ORF2 encoding the primary structural protein that forms the outer shell of the viral particles. These structural proteins play a crucial role in protecting the genome and interacting with host cells, leading to infection and the onset of symptoms in the host [2]. Human AstV (HAstV) is an important pathogen responsible for diarrhea in infants and young children [3]. It can cause more severe symptoms in individuals with weakened immune systems, such as immunodeficient patients and those undergoing long-term cancer treatment. Additionally, HAstV can infect the human brain, leading to encephalitis and meningitis [4]. Compared to mammals, avian species infected with AstVs tend to experience more severe symptoms. AstVs in poultry, also known as AAstVs, induce poultry enteritis death syndrome, broiler growth retardation syndrome, kidney and visceral gout in broilers, and fatal hepatitis in ducklings [5], causing detrimental effects on the growth and development of poultry, leading to stunted growth, increased mortality, and substantial economic losses. Over the past half century, AAstVs have caused widespread epidemics in various host species [6].

Since their discovery in 1975, AstVs have demonstrated remarkable genetic diversity and a wide host range, attracting significant biological research interest. Previous studies classified AstVs based on their host species of origin. However, our understanding of AstVs has expanded with advancing research, revealing their ability to infect diverse animal populations and prompting further investigation of their biological characteristics and epidemiology. The extensive host range of AstVs is truly impressive, including poultry, livestock (such as pigs, cows, and sheep), fish, reptiles, and birds [7]. The wide host range of AstVs highlights their adaptability and potential for cross-species transmission, necessitating an understanding of their epidemiology and the development of appropriate control measures. Different types of AstVs typically infect specific host populations, and host specificity may vary. Notably, numerous novel AstVs have been identified with the development of sequencing technologies. Classifying AstVs based solely on host species is no longer sufficient to encompass the vast genetic diversity of these viruses. In 2010, the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) proposed a classification system for AstVs based on the amino acid sequences of the ORF2 genomic region. According to this system, the genus MAstV was classified into MAstV-1–19, and AAstV was classified into AAstV-1–3 [8]. This classification approach based on the ORF2 gene region allows for a more comprehensive understanding of the genetic diversity and evolutionary relationships among AstVs. To date, a significant number of AstVs remain unclassified, primarily because of the limited availability of ORF2 sequences, which makes consistent classification challenging [7]. Another contributing factor is the high mutation rate of AstVs, which enables recombination events between different strains, resulting in high genetic diversity and facilitating cross-species transmission. Furthermore, the ability of AstVs to undergo recombination events and cross-species transmission highlights their adaptive nature and potential for emergence as novel pathogens, emphasizing the importance of surveillance and research efforts to monitor AstV diversity, understand their ecological dynamics, and identify potential threats to public health.

Recently, a group of hepe-AstV-like RNA viruses associated with AstVs were identified and named bastroviruses (BastVs). BastVs have been found in the feces of healthy humans [9], pigs [10], bats [11], and rodents. Unlike AstVs, BastVs encode only two ORFs. ORF1, which encodes non-structural proteins, shows high homology to the Hepatitis E virus (HEV) and ORF2, which encodes a structural protein, is closely related to the AstVs. Therefore, BastVs are considered recombinant viruses formed through recombination events between AstVs and HEV [9].

In recent years, many new and re-emerging infectious diseases have appeared globally, with increasing occurrences of cross-species transmission of viruses originating from animals [12, 13]. Notably, over half of human diseases are caused by pathogens that originate in animals [14, 15], with bats, rodents, and birds serving as important reservoirs. Therefore, conducting epidemic surveillance of diseases in wildlife is crucial to gain insights into the virus before it becomes highly pathogenic [16]. This proactive approach helps to take preventive measures in advance, and effectively protect the human population. The Yunnan Province is renowned for its rich biodiversity and abundant animal and plant resources. However, the research on AstVs in this region is limited. Considering the prevalence of diseases and the potential for cross-species transmission, studying the epidemiology and evolutionary relationships of AstVs in wild animals is crucial for gaining a better understanding of their genetic diversity and evolutionary dynamics. This knowledge is invaluable for the early detection, rapid response, and implementation of effective control measures to mitigate the impact of emerging infectious diseases. Further, understanding the ecological factors and host–pathogen interactions in wildlife provides important insights into the evolution and spread of infectious diseases. In this study, we discovered a novel AstV through comparative genomics and phylogenetic analyses, observed the potential characteristics of interspecies transmission, and, for the first time, reported the presence of BastVs in Yunnan, China.

Methods

Animal trapping and sample collection

The samples used in this study were collected from various states and cities in the Yunnan Province, China, between June 2020 and May 2023. The samples included bats, rodents, wild boars, and birds. To collect wild rodents, trapping devices were placed near natural habitats and human settlements in the evening. The traps were retrieved early in the morning the following day to ensure the freshness of the rodent samples. The captured rodents were euthanized and placed on dry ice for transportation while maintaining their integrity. Most wild boar (Sus scrofa) samples were collected by trained forest rangers. After capturing the wild boars, swab samples were obtained from their bodies after anesthesia, and in certain cases of wild boar dying, tissue samples were collected. In addition, fresh fecal samples from bats and birds were collected with a 1-m interval between each sample to prevent contamination. All swab and fecal samples were placed in a virus preservation solution (hubei, China) and transported to the laboratory on dry ice. They were stored at -80 °C for subsequent laboratory analysis and research. Meticulous sample collection and preservation procedures were employed to ensure the integrity and quality of the samples and to facilitate accurate laboratory investigations.

Viral nucleic acid extraction and taxonomic assignments

To obtain the required tissue samples, the captured rodent specimens were dissected, and the respective tissue samples were placed in a virus preservation solution for further experiments. After dissection, the waste was properly disposed of to prevent environmental contamination and human exposure. Suspensions from animal tissues, swabs, and fecal samples were prepared using grinding and centrifugation. RNA and DNA extractions were performed using 200 µL of homogenized solution with the Tianamp Virus RNA Kit and Tianamp Genomic DNA Kit, respectively, following the manufacturer’s instructions. After species identification using the Cytochrome oxidase I gene and the Cytochrome B gene [17, 18], the extracted nucleic acids were stored at -80 °C for further experiments.

Detection and next-generation sequencing (NGS) of AstVs

AstVs were detected using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) targeting the RdRp gene, using a previously established method [19]. The PCR system and conditions were set according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Subsequently, a representative subset of AstV-positive samples in four species was selected for NGS, which was conducted at Magigene. The sequencing data obtained were subjected to de novo assembly using an automated pipeline. During the assembly process, viral reads were identified using DIAMOND protein alignment and compared with the Swissprot Uniref 90 database. Identified viral reads were grouped based on their lowest common ancestors and assembled using SPAdes. The resulting contigs were further aligned and merged using Advanced Genome Aligner. To validate the obtained sequences and acquire the complete genome, primers were designed using DNASTAR and Oligo 7. These primers were then used to verify and amplify the full-length genome.

Genomic analysis of the AstVs and BastVs

ORFs were predicted using ORFfinder (NCBI: https://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/orffinder/). cNLS Mapper42 was used for nuclear localization signals, and National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Conserved Domains (NCBI: https://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/Structure/cdd/wrpsb.cgi) was used to identify serine protease domains, RdRp, and the conserved region of the capsid.

Phylogenetic and homology analyses

Reference strains of AstVs were downloaded from GenBank. Sequence alignment and editing were performed using ClustalW (version 2.0) and BioEdit (version 7.1.9), respectively. Subsequently, the Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA)-X software was used to determine the optimal model for DNA/protein analysis. The best-fit model selected using MEGA-X was used to construct a neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree. Notably, 1,000 replicate trees were constructed to assess the robustness of the inferred phylogeny. Bootstrap values > 70% were used as thresholds to validate the grouping accuracy. Homology analysis was conducted on the selected sequences to determine the degree of similarity.

Results

Surveillance and identification of AstVs

Between June 2020 and May 2023, 1,333 samples of different species were collected from various states/cities in Yunnan, China, including 193 bat, 237 rodent, 86 wild boar, and 817 poultry samples (Fig. 1). Reverse transcription PCR was used to screen for AstVs by targeting their RdRp region. Among the 95 samples (7.12%) that tested positive for AstVs (Table 1), the highest infection rate was observed in wild boars (24.41%), followed by rodents (20.67%), bats (9.32%), and birds (0.50%).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Collection infographic about the samples used in this study

Full size image
Table 1 Samples tested for AstVs in this study
Full size table

Diversity and host range of AstVs

To investigate the genetic characteristics of AstVs, 95 sequences of the RdRp gene (422 bp) were obtained and included in the analysis along with 95 reference sequences from the NCBI gene database. As shown in Fig. 2a, the sequences in the phylogenetic tree clustered into two groups: MAstV and AAstV. Notably, 78 strains from mammals and 1 strain from a bird belonged to the MAstV group. Six strains from birds and one strain from rodents clustered in the AAstV group.

Fig. 2
figure 2

(a) According to the partial nucleotide sequences of the RdRp gene (369 bp), sequence comparison and clustering were performed with representative AstVs. Maximum likelihood method was used to construct tree (ML), model (GTR + G), and bootstrap analysis was performed 1000 times; (b) phylogenetic tree based on partial nucleotide sequences of RdRp genes (372 bp) of MAstV, model (GTR + G); (c) phylogenetic tree based on partial nucleotide sequences of RdRp genes (369 bp) of AAstV, model (GTR + G). The strains obtained in this study are represented by different color symbols

Full size image

The strains isolated from bats were further divided into two distinct groups. One group exhibited a high degree of diversity and clustered closely with strains of bats from Jiangxi (FJ571079.1) and Cambodia (KX858532.1), whereas the other group formed an independent evolutionary branch and shared high nucleotide homology with bat strains from Gabon (KU510446.1) and Guangxi (NC 043100.1). Multiple AstV strains were detected in the same sample and demonstrated distant evolutionary relationships in the phylogenetic analysis (CHN/YN/Nj-49-1/2022 and CHN/YN/Nj-49-2/2022). Rodent strains formed three main evolutionary branches. The branch represented by CHN/YN/WS-07/2022 was adjacent to the bat-related branch, whereas the branch represented by CHN/YN/WS-23/2022 was adjacent to the monophyletic group porcine AstV (PAstV)-4 and included a strain from Hierococcyx sparverioides ( Cuculiformes). The last branch, represented by CHN/YN/KM-5/2022, is evolutionarily distant from the other two branches. The five strains were classified into a monophyletic group formed by PAstV-2. One strain was closely related to the squirrel-associated AstV (OM451109.1). AstVs isolated from wild boar were categorized into three PAstV lineages: PAstV-2, PastV-4, and PastV-5. One strain (BAstV CHN/YN/Nj-133/2022) showed the closest relationship with PAstV-2 (Fig. 2b).

Three groups of AAstVs were observed using phylogenetic analysis of the reference sequences from GenBank and strains isolated from wild birds. Except for the one viral strain described above, six strains, detected from Larus ridibundus (Charadriiformes) and Turdus dissimilis (Passeriformes), appeared in two groups (Fig. 2c). Avian nephritis virus and its closely related lineages were clustered in group 2. Three AstVs detected in Larus ridibundus clustered in this group were closely related to the AAstVs detected in Kunming. Other strains related to strains from several wild duck species reported in Hong Kong were clustered in group. A strain from rodent was grouped into group 1, which included turkey AstV (TAstV)1, TAstV2, duck AstV, duck hepatitis virus 3, and chicken AstV, showing multiple species origins.

Genomic and phylogenetic analyses of the two rodent AstVs (RoAstVs)

In order to acquire more genomic fragments, facilitating full-length genome amplification and enabling a comprehensive exploration of novel AstVs, this study conducted transcriptome sequencing on representative strains from four species representing different evolutionary branches (Table S1). We found the full-length genome data of RoAstVs in pool 15 and pool 14 respectively. Through PCR validation (Table S2), we obtained near-full-length sequences of two RoAstVs (RoAstV-LH-36 [Rodent_astrovirus_CHN/YN/LH-36/2022] and RoAstV-KM-5 [Rodent_astrovirus_CHN/YN/KM-5/2022). Genome ORF prediction revealed that the two strains of RoAstVs exhibited genomic structural features similar to those of most AstVs (Fig. 3a). The strain RoAstV-LH-36 has a ribosomal frameshift sequence (RFS) (nt positions 2656AAAAAAC2662) located within ORF1a, which is 2,739 nt in length. A trypsin-like peptidase domain (TLPD) is present in the middle of ORF1a (nt positions 1,409–1,768). ORF1b is 1,434 nt in length and contains conserved RdRp motifs at positions 3,181–3,897. The nucleotide sequence (nt positions 4,394–5,335) encoding the capsid protein precursor was located in ORF2 (2,517 nt in length). In the RoAstV-KM-5 strain, RFS (nt positions 2609AAAAAAC2015) was identified in the overlapping region of ORF1a (2,637 nt in length) and ORF1b (1,566 nt in length). The TLPD is located in the middle region of ORF1a (nt positions 1,305–1,667). ORF1b contains the conserved RdRp sequence at positions 3,134–3,847. The front region of ORF2 (2,370 nt in length) encodes the capsid protein, with the nucleotide sequence ranging from 4,299 to 5,354.

Fig. 3
figure 3

(a) Schematic representation of the genomic organization of the two novel RoAstV. TLPD, a Trypsin-like peptidase domain; RFS, a ribosomal frame shift sequence; RdRp, RNA-dependent RNA polymerase; capsid, Astrovirus capsid protein precursor. (b) Phylogenetic analysis based on ORF2 sequences of AstVs, Maximum likelihood method was used to construct tree (ML), model (GTR + G + I), and bootstrap analysis was performed 1000 times. RoAstVs characterized in this study are marked in red. Species in black italics are included in the International Committee for Taxonomy of Viruses proposal [20]. Species in grey italics were proposed by Guix et al [21]

Full size image

Classic strains of AstVs were selected as reference strains for the phylogenetic analysis of full-length ORF2 (Fig. 3b). Partial reference strains, including the complete ORF2 region, were selected for amino acid homology analysis (Table 2). Phylogenetic analysis showed that the two strains of interest were distantly related. The strain RoAstV-LH-36 clustered with a strain discovered in rodents from Hong Kong (KT946729.1), with a bootstrap value of over 95% and shared 79.59% nucleotide homology. Amino acid homology analysis yielded consistent results. All three ORFs shared the highest homology with strain KT946729.1, with 86.19, 92.20, and 75.48% similarity in ORF1a, ORF1b, and ORF2, respectively. The RoAstV-KM-5 strain was adjacent to but did not cluster with the strain related to MAstV-25, forming a distinct evolutionary branch. Homology analysis revealed that ORF1a and ORF2 had the highest homology with the strain discovered in the Qinghai Province, China (KY855439.1), with 31.94 and 31.31% similarity, respectively. However, ORF1b of this strain exhibited the highest homology (57.93%) with a strain discovered in rodents in Hong Kong (KT946729.1).

Table 2 Amino acid homology analysis of two RoAstVs to other AstVs.
Full size table

Genomic and phylogenetic analyses of rodent BAstVs (RoBAstVs)

The presence of BAstVs in rodents was discovered In the transcriptome data of pool 18. Based on the transcriptome results, primers were designed to screen for BAstVs in all rodent samples. Three samples were positive for BastV (Table S3). Considering the high nucleotide homology, RoBAstV-LH-6 (Rodent_Bastrovirus_CHN/YN/LH-6/2022) was selected as a representative strain for full-length amplification (Table S4). RoBAstV-LH-6 comprised two ORFs (Fig. 4a). Conserved domains, including viral methyltransferase (nt positions 105–980), viral helicase (nt positions 1,473–2,156), and RdRp (nt positions 2,802–3,278), were distributed within ORF1 (3,672 nt in length), whereas the capsid protein precursor (nt positions 3,644–4,747) spanned across both ORF1 and ORF2 (2,517 nt in length). To understand the phylogenetic relationships of RoBAstV-LH-6, we constructed phylogenetic trees for ORF1 and ORF2 using representative strains from the BastVs and HEV families (Fig. 4b, c). Based on the phylogenetic analysis of ORF1, four well-supported branches were observed, including the Astroviridae family, HEV family, human BastVs, and animal (rodent, bat, and pig)-related BastVs. The evolutionary distance between BastVs and HEV was shorter than that between BastVs and members of the Astroviridae family. In the phylogenetic tree of ORF2, only three highly supported branches were observed. Human BastVs and Astroviridae clustered together, whereas animal BastVs and HEV formed separate clusters. BastVs and the Astroviridae family showed a close evolutionary relationship. Phylogenetic analysis based on different ORFs consistently clustered RoBastVs-LH-6 with rodent-related BastVs, with the highest nucleotide homology of 76.98% (full-length) to the strain from Vietnam (KX907132.1). To explore the amino acid homology of RoBAstV-LH-6, we performed homology analysis using representative strains from the BastV family (Table 3). RoBAstV-LH-6 shared the highest homology with strain KX907132.1, with 89.84 and 72.76% homology to ORF1 and ORF2, respectively.

Fig. 4
figure 4

(a) Schematic representation of the genomic organization of RoBastv-LH-6. Vmt, viral methyltransferase; Helicase, viral helicase; RdRp, RNA-dependent RNA polymerase; capsid, capsid protein precursor. (b) Phylogenetic analysis based on ORF1 sequences of BastVs, HEV and AstVs, Maximum likelihood method was used to construct tree (ML), model (GTR + G + I), and bootstrap analysis was performed 1000 times. (c) Phylogenetic analysis based on ORF2 sequences of BastVs, HEV and AstVs, Maximum likelihood method was used to construct tree (ML), model (GTR + G + I), and bootstrap analysis was performed 1000 times. RoBastVs characterized in this study are marked in red

Full size image
Table 3 Amino acid homology analysis of RoBastv-LH-6 to other BastVs.
Full size table

Discussion

AstVs are characterized by their genetic diversity, extensive host range, and cross-species transmission. However, owing to the lack of severe human diseases and large-scale outbreaks associated with AstV infections, they have been neglected by virologists. Currently, most research on AstVs focuses on humans and animals related to livestock farming, whereas little is known about the prevalence and genetic characteristics of AstVs in wild animals. In this study, we aimed to address this knowledge gap by conducting AstV detection in wild animals, such as bats and rodents, which play crucial roles in viral transmission [22,23,24,25]. We evaluated the infection rates and genetic features of the viral strains, the detection results revealed that wild boars exhibited the highest AstV infection rate (24.4%), consistent with their known high tolerance to AstV infections [26]. Unlike the significantly high infection rates observed in domestic pigs, the extensive habitat range of wild boars reduces the risk of fecal-oral transmission. The lifestyle habits of rodents, on the other hand, provide ideal opportunities for AstV transmission. In this study, the infection rate among rodents (20.67%) closely resembled previous research findings [27]. Furthermore, varying infection rates were observed among different bat species (ranging from 0 to 16.66%), confirming the species-specific nature of Bat AstV [28]. The infection rate of AstV in wild birds was only 0.50%, which is different from the infection rate in poultry [29]. Moreover, we attempted to provide evidence of interspecies transmission of AstVs among mammals and birds, as well as the phenomenon of co-infection. Through a systematic phylogenetic analysis of 95 AstV strains derived from different animal species, we observed the formation of species-specific and multi-host clusters among these AstVs. RoAstVs typically form multi-host clusters, likely due to the frequent exposure of rodents to the excreta of other animals in their living environment. These findings highlight the strong infectivity and spillover capability of AstVs, revealing their genetic diversity and wide host range [30].

Cross-species transmission is an important way for viruses to break through their inherent hosts and gain more living space, resulting in greater genetic diversity through subsequent adaptation to new hosts. To date, a considerable number of AstV interspecies transmission events have been reported, including cross-species transmission among mammals [31,32,33], birds [34,35,36], and between mammals and birds [37]. These transmission events demonstrate that AstVs can infect and rapidly adapt to new hosts due to their high environmental stability [38, 39]. In this study, we discovered that AstV sequences were closely related to PAstVs in bats and rodents. Similar events were observed for AstVs carried by Hierococcyx sparverioides, where the viral sequences showed close affinity to AstV sequences from the rodents. Notably, most current research on AstV recombination and transmission is based on similarities with previously published sequences. However, most of these studies rely on partial sequences [27, 40]. The intra- and inter-species transmission could be better understood using the number of complete AstV genomes to truly assess the potential and surveillance of emerging zoonotic AstVs.

Due to the wide host range and high genetic diversity within the AstV family, the ICTV has made several revisions to the classification scheme [41]. In 2010, the ICTV classified AstVs based on the complete amino acid sequence of ORF2, with a minimum homology threshold of 75% for strains of the same species [42]. However, owing to the limited availability of complete genome sequences, a significant number of AstVs remain unclassified. Among the 19 mammalian AstV classifications certified by the ICTV, no strains from rodents have been identified; only two strains, MAstV-20 (mouse) and MAstV-25 (rat), have been provisionally classified as new species within the tentative 14 mammalian AstV classifications [43]. Compared to the extensive research on rodents in other viral fields, studies on AstVs in rodents are still insufficient. In this study, we obtained 49 AstV sequences from rodent samples, including two complete viral sequences. The RoAstV-LH-36 strain showed the closest genetic relationship to strain KT946729.1 from Hong Kong, which was classified as a new genotype (Cluster A) in earlier research [44]. Another strain, RoAstV-KM-5, exhibited significant non-homology, with a maximum amino acid homology of only 31.31% in the ORF2. This clearly indicates that it represents a novel AstV species in mammals, which we provisionally named MAstV-34. Most rodent samples used in this study were from Rattus tanezumi and R. norvegicus, which frequently come into close contact with human living environments. Although no cases of AstV infections caused by rodent strains have been reported in humans, the potential interspecies transmission ability of AstVs warrants preventive measures.

BastV was first discovered in human fecal samples in the Netherlands in 2016. Subsequently, it has been identified in bats (Vietnam and Cameroon), rodents, and pigs (the United States and Japan). Due to its unique genomic characteristics, this virus is believed to be a recombinant product of AstV and HEV [45]. In this study, BastVs were found in R. tanezumi from Lianghe, which tested positive for AstVs. Owing to high nucleotide homology, we amplified only the full-length sequence of RoBastv-LH-6. From an evolutionary perspective, RoBastv-LH-6 may have been transmitted by Vietnamese rats or shared a common ancestor with them. Nevertheless, RoBastv-LH-6 evolved independently within the rat population in China over a considerable period. Unfortunately, research on BastVs is limited, and fewer than 50 complete BastV nucleotide sequences are available in the NCBI database (BAstV - Nucleotide - NCBI [nih.gov]; accessed on November 18, 2023), therefore, the ICTV has not classified BastVs. Further studies are required to better understand the pathogenicity and genetic characteristics of BastVs.

Conclusions

AstVs are excellent candidates for studying human, animal, and environmental health. They are highly prevalent worldwide and have been found in a wide range of host species [6]. They pose a significant burden on public health and livestock due to zoonotic transmission to humans and reverse zoonosis to marine mammals [46, 47]. Further research on the epidemiology, pathogenesis, and interspecies transmission mechanisms will contribute to our understanding of the evolutionary history of the viral kingdom and the driving forces behind viral genetic diversity. In this study, we identified many AstV sequences and described their genetic characteristics. Additionally, we identified a novel mammalian AstV strain and, for the first time, provided the evidence of the presence of BastV in Yunnan, China. These findings highlight the need for further research and surveillance to better understand the epidemiology, pathogenicity, and transmission dynamics of AstVs, including newly discovered AstVs, and the prevalence of BastVs in specific regions, such as Yunnan, China. In addition, our findings may help develop the appropriate measures to prevent widespread epidemics caused by AstVs in various host species.

Data availability

Data is provided within the supplementary information files.

Abbreviations

AstVs:

Astroviruses

AAstV :

Avastrovirus

BastVs:

Bastroviruses

HEV:

Hepatitis E virus

HAstV:

Human AstV

ICTV:

International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses

MAstV :

Mammastrovirus

NCBI:

National Center for Biotechnology Information

NGS:

Next-generation sequencing

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

RdRp:

RNA-dependent RNA polymerase

RoAstVs:

Rodent AstVs

RoBAstVs:

Rodent BAstVs

References

  1. Zhang F, Li Y, Jiang W, et al. Surveillance and genetic diversity analysis of avian astrovirus in China [J]. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(2):e0264308.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang P, Su H, Peng R, et al. Identification of a Novel Astrovirus in Pinnipeds [J]. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:845601.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Vu DL, Sabria A, Aregall N et al. Novel Human astroviruses: Prevalence and Association with Common enteric viruses in undiagnosed gastroenteritis cases in Spain [J]. Viruses, 2019, 11(7).

  4. Vu D-L, Cordey S, Brito F, et al. Novel human astroviruses: novel human diseases? [J]. J Clin Virol. 2016;82:56–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yin L, Zhou Q, Mai K, et al. Isolation and characterization of a novel chicken astrovirus in China [J]. Poult Sci. 2021;100(9):101363.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. De Benedictis P, Schultz-Cherry S, Burnham A, et al. Astrovirus infections in humans and animals–molecular biology, genetic diversity, and interspecies transmissions [J]. Infect Genet Evol. 2011;11(7):1529–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Donato C, Vijaykrishna D. The Broad Host Range and genetic diversity of mammalian and avian astroviruses [J]. Viruses, 2017, 9(5).

  8. Wang J, Xu C, Zeng M, et al. Identification of a novel astrovirus in goats in China [J]. Infect Genet Evol. 2021;96:105105.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Oude Munnink BB, Cotten M, Canuti M et al. A novel astrovirus-like RNA virus detected in human stool [J]. Virus Evol, 2016, 2(1).

  10. Bauermann FV, Hause B, Buysse AR, et al. Identification and genetic characterization of a porcine hepe-astrovirus (bastrovirus) in the United States [J]. Arch Virol. 2019;164:2321–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mishra N, Fagbo SF, Alagaili AN, et al. A viral metagenomic survey identifies known and novel mammalian viruses in bats from Saudi Arabia [J]. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(4):e0214227.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Cleaveland S, Haydon DT, Taylor L. Overviews of pathogen emergence: which pathogens emerge, when and why? [J]. Wildlife and emerging zoonotic diseases: the biology, circumstances and consequences of cross-species transmission, 2007: 85–111.

  13. Allen T, Murray KA, Zambrana-Torrelio C, et al. Global hotspots and correlates of emerging zoonotic diseases [J]. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):1124.

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Wiethoelter AK, Beltrán-Alcrudo D, Kock R et al. Global trends in infectious diseases at the wildlife–livestock interface [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2015, 112(31): 9662–9667.

  15. Grange ZL, Goldstein T, Johnson CK et al. Ranking the risk of animal-to-human spillover for newly discovered viruses [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2021, 118(15): e2002324118.

  16. Parrish CR, Holmes EC, Morens DM, et al. Cross-species virus transmission and the emergence of new epidemic diseases [J]. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2008;72(3):457–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Irwin DM, Kocher TD, Wilson AC. Evolution of the cytochrome b gene of mammals [J]. J Mol Evol. 1991;32:128–44.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cheung PP, Leung YC, Chow C-K, et al. Identifying the species-origin of faecal droppings used for avian influenza virus surveillance in wild-birds [J]. J Clin Virol. 2009;46(1):90–3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Chu D, Poon L, Guan Y, et al. Novel astroviruses in insectivorous bats [J]. J Virol. 2008;82(18):9107–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Bosch A, Guix S, Krishna N et al. Nineteen new species in the genus Mamastrovirus in the Astroviridae family [J]. ICTV 2010018aV2010b)[Google Scholar], 2010.

  21. Guix S, Bosch A, Pintó RM. Astrovirus taxonomy [J]. Astrovírus research: essential ideas, everyday impacts, future directions, 2013: 97–118.

  22. Serra-Cobo J, López-Roig M. Bats and emerging infections: an ecological and virological puzzle [J]. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;972:35–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fuller T, Bensch S, Müller I, et al. The ecology of emerging infectious diseases in migratory birds: an assessment of the role of climate change and priorities for future research [J]. EcoHealth. 2012;9(1):80–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Meng XJ, Lindsay DS, Sriranganathan N. Wild boars as sources for infectious diseases in livestock and humans [J]. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009;364(1530):2697–707.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Meerburg BG, Singleton GR, Kijlstra A. Rodent-borne diseases and their risks for public health [J]. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2009;35(3):221–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kuczera K, Orłowska A, Smreczak M, et al. Prevalence of astroviruses in different animal species in Poland [J]. Viruses. 2024;16(1):80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Neves ES, Mendenhall IH, Borthwick SA, et al. Genetic diversity and expanded host range of astroviruses detected in small mammals in Singapore [J]. One Health. 2021;12:100218.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Fischer K, Zeus V, Kwasnitschka L, et al. Insectivorous bats carry host specific astroviruses and coronaviruses across different regions in Germany [J]. Infect Genet Evol. 2016;37:108–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Todd D, Wilkinson DS, Jewhurst HL, et al. A seroprevalence investigation of chicken astrovirus infections [J]. Avian Pathol. 2009;38(4):301–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Donato C, Vijaykrishna D. The broad host range and genetic diversity of mammalian and avian astroviruses [J]. Viruses. 2017;9(5):102.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Lukashov VV, Goudsmit J. Evolutionary relationships among astroviridae [J]. J Gen Virol. 2002;83(6):1397–405.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Atkins A, Wellehan JF Jr, Childress AL, et al. Characterization of an outbreak of astroviral diarrhea in a group of cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus) [J]. Vet Microbiol. 2009;136(1–2):160–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Van Hemert FJ, Berkhout B, Lukashov VV. Host-related nucleotide composition and codon usage as driving forces. Recent Evol Astroviridae [J] Virol. 2007;361(2):447–54.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Biđin M, Biđin Z, Majnarić D, et al. Circulation and phylogenetic relationship of chicken and turkey-origin astroviruses detected in domestic ducks (Anas platyrhynchos Domesticus) [J]. Avian Pathol. 2012;41(6):555–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Strain E, Kelley LA, Schultz-Cherry S, et al. Genomic analysis of closely related astroviruses [J]. J Virol. 2008;82(10):5099–103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. De Battisti C, Salviato A, Jonassen CM, et al. Genetic characterization of astroviruses detected in guinea fowl (Numida meleagris) reveals a distinct genotype and suggests cross-species transmission between Turkey and guinea fowl [J]. Arch Virol. 2012;157:1329–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Huang X, Zhou J, Hou Y, et al. Diversity and genetic characteristics of Astroviruses from animals in Yunnan Province [J]. Viruses. 2022;14(10):2234.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Schultz-Cherry S. Astrovirus research: essential ideas, everyday impacts, future directions [M]. Springer Science & Business Media; 2012.

  39. Wohlgemuth N, Honce R, Schultz-Cherry S. Astrovirus evolution and emergence [J]. Infect Genet Evol. 2019;69:30–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang P, Su H, Peng R, et al. Identification of a Novel Astrovirus in Pinnipeds [J]. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:966.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Krishnan T. Novel human astroviruses: challenges for developing countries [J]. VirusDisease. 2014;25(2):208–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. King AM, Lefkowitz E, Adams MJ, et al. Virus taxonomy: ninth report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of viruses: 9 [M]. Elsevier; 2011.

  43. Schultz-Cherry S. Astrovirus Research [M]. Springer; 2013.

  44. To KKW, Chan W-M, Li KSM, et al. High prevalence of four novel astrovirus genotype species identified from rodents in China [J]. J Gen Virol. 2017;98(5):1004–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Yinda CK, Ghogomu SM, Conceicao-Neto N, et al. Cameroonian fruit bats harbor divergent viruses, including rotavirus H, bastroviruses, and picobirnaviruses using an alternative genetic code [J]. Virus Evol. 2018;4(1):vey008.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Brown JR, Morfopoulou S, Hubb J, et al. Astrovirus VA1/HMO-C: an increasingly recognized neurotropic pathogen in immunocompromised patients [J]. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;60(6):881–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Rivera R, Nollens HH, Venn-Watson S, et al. Characterization of phylogenetically diverse astroviruses of marine mammals [J]. J Gen Virol. 2010;91(1):166–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by grants from Yunnan Key R&D Program (No. 202103AQ100001), Yunnan Major Scientific and Technological Projects (No. 202202AG050013), Yunnan Province Basic Research Program Projects (No. 202101AS070028).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Xingyu Huang and Junjie Hou contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Life Science and Technology, Kunming University of Science and Technology, 650500, Kunming, Yunnan, P.R. China

    Xingyu Huang, Junjie Hou, Xiang Le, Yutong Hou, Lingsi Yang, Qian Li, Binghui Wang & Xueshan Xia

Authors
  1. Xingyu Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Junjie Hou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiang Le
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yutong Hou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lingsi Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Qian Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Binghui Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Xueshan Xia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

X.H., B.W. and X.X. were responsible for study design and planning; X.H., J.H., Y.L. Y.H., L.Y. contributed to samples collection and management; X.H. and J.H. contributed to data analysis; X.H. writing original draft preparation; X.H., B.W., J.H., Q.L. and X.X. contributed to writing, review and editing; funding acquisition, X.X. B.W.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Binghui Wang or Xueshan Xia.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee of Kunming University of Science and Technology (protocol number: 16,048).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, X., Hou, J., Le, X. et al. Diversity of astroviruses in wild animals in Yunnan province, China. Virol J 21, 51 (2024). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12985-024-02314-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12985-024-02314-0

Keywords

Virology Journal

ISSN: 1743-422X